Skip to page content

 

Visiting Professors' Scheme

Visiting Professors in Integrated System Design: What we have done so far

In the pilot phase of this scheme, Birmingham, Brunel, City, Edinburgh and UCL were asked to propose their own strategy to help their students to become more “system aware”. In the first round of open competition, Bath, Cranfield, Loughborough, Plymouth, Queen’s Belfast and Surrey were also admitted to the scheme. In this year’s competition, we expect to make five more appointments.

Extracts from some of the previous proposals highlight the approaches of the successful bidders:

University A:

By using the VP to facilitate integrated thinking between the disciplines, the concept of multidisciplinary thinking can be injected into existing and new courses across the Engineering Sciences and other faculties. The idea is that systems integration is seen as a core element of thought rather than as a bolt-on addition once some discipline has been exhausted. The Visiting Professor would be an additional cost-neutral resource to facilitate the encouragement of systems integration principles and to stimulate interdisciplinary and interdepartmental activities.

University B:

Its past history of systems engineering and recent moves aimed at renewal have meant that University B is some way ahead of the game in this field. However, it recognises that the position is fragile and is in urgent need of resource if the University is to sustain its current commitment and enhance its offering. There is a need to extend the teaching to cover techniques in proper depth and to illustrate these with case studies. Realistic case studies are considered essential for students to get a proper grasp of the relevance and utility of systems engineering to the real world.

University C saw the role of the VP as:

  • To liaise with staff across the School of Engineering and from industry to provide a number of lectures in appropriate modules on fundamental concepts within systems engineering in the first and second years of the undergraduate programmes.

  • To develop further the multi-disciplinary projects, that have been successfully running for the last five years in years 3 and 4 of the programmes, but with a stronger systems engineering component.

University D:

We propose an interdisciplinary team learning group design exercise in year 4……For example, a multidisciplinary group of engineering students from three of our disciplines could study topics such as hydro power generation, water resource systems, nanotechnology, or other larger scale systems. Group design projects are already incorporated into our syllabus as part of the BEng and MEng degree programmes, but to date they are only mono-disciplinary.

We thus propose introducing “team” final year group study exercises from different disciplines where the topic is extended beyond a mono-disciplinary theme, with each student studying their separate component part while still working as a group.

Is there a unique way?

Every year, The Academy brings together all of the participating universities and their visiting professors in a workshop to review progress and “issues”. Over the last year we have spent some time examining the question: “Is there a common approach to system integration that we should propose as a model for all applicants to the scheme?” The simple answer is “no”. David Stupples (VP at City University) presented a keynote paper at this year’s workshop which reviewed major issues and history in Systems Integration, and proposed a three tier model for teaching system integration. We would commend all applicants to read this paper (129KB).

 

Skip to page footer

 

[top of the page]